The asset tracking market can be segmented in various ways, including by component, deployment type, end-user industry, and geography. On the demand side, industries like fleet, container, and logistics were early adopters of asset tracking. While the fleet currently holds over 77% of the market, non-fleet asset tracking is growing at an 18% faster rate. The combination of increased device functionality and component miniaturisation is driving a new generation of low-cost tracking devices, introducing new markets and device categories, such as disposable trackers. As asset tracking technology becomes more affordable, solutions are reaching smaller and medium-sized enterprises, driving further growth in the total addressable market.
On the supply side, the asset tracking market remains highly fragmented, with multiple vendors offering diverse solutions. These solution providers are heavily investing in R&D to enhance existing solutions and introduce new products that integrate the latest technologies. Concurrently, many suppliers of asset tracking solutions see global expansion as a lucrative opportunity to grow and capture market share. In such a dynamic and competitive landscape, integrating the latest technologies with short development cycles and optimised costs becomes pivotal. Developers must judiciously select the best technologies for their application, while also considering the availability of supporting tools and environments.
Key Asset Tracking Technologies
In many aspects, asset tracking technology can be perceived as one of the primary use cases of the IoT. IoT devices seamlessly integrate remote sensors with intelligent devices and sophisticated analytics. The form factor of IoT devices has shrunk significantly due to advancements in electronics miniaturisation. Moreover, the IoT has spurred innovations in low-power devices and wireless communications, both of which have significantly benefited asset tracking technology.
An asset tracking device typically integrates a microcontroller unit (MCU) with functionalities like wireless transceivers and neural network accelerators. These devices also encompass a variety of sensors to capture and measure parameters such as temperature, humidity, shock, and vibration forces. Additionally, these devices may boast advanced power management capabilities, allowing them to shut down functions when not in use, thereby extending battery life.
Asset tracking devices employ wireless technologies to ascertain their position, with eight primary wireless technologies being utilised based on the specific application (see Figure 2). For instance, Ultra-Wideband (UWB) is a relatively novel technology for asset tracking and real-time location, but it outshines other technologies in terms of accuracy, scalability, security, and cost. UWB's capability to penetrate objects and function without a direct line-of-sight between devices makes it apt for extending GNSS-style positioning functionality to indoor settings like factories, warehouses, offices, classrooms, and hospital wards. However, its primary shortcoming, in contrast to Wi-Fi or GNSS, is its need for unique infrastructure in the designated tracking area, specifically in the form of TDoA anchors.
Technology |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) |
- Low power consumption
- Can be cheap to acquire BLE tags
- Accurate between one to three meters
- Read range between thirty to eighty meters
|
- Latency issues in some real-time applications
- Interference and dropped data
- Don't cope well in cluttered environments with a lot of metal or reflective surfaces
|
Wi-Fi
|
- Real-time location tracking
- Fewer data-bridging systems needed
- Read range between 60-100 meters
|
- Can't scale
- Power-hungry tags
- Poses security risks
|
Cellular Positioning
|
- Long range / global reach
- Standardisation
|
- Power hungry tags
- Low accuracy
- Not reliable indoors or underground
|
GPS
|
- Global visibility
- Stable and mature
- Can be scaled by using tags
- Almost inter interference-free
|
- Only works outdoors
- Requires a line of sight with at least 4 satellites
- High power consumption
|
RFID
|
- Longevity
- Small in size
- Low-cost tags or labels
|
- Lower precision
- Wireless signals easy to intercept
- Cannot provide real-time location data
|
NFC
|
- Fast set-up
- Inexpensive tags
- Suitable for high-density applications
- Compatible with passive RFID infrastructures
|
- Short read range
- Cannot be used in 2D or 3D spaces
|
LPWAN
|
- Long-range wireless connectivity
- Tags have a long battery life
- Indoor and outdoor coverage
- Good for large-scale deployments
|
- Low data transfer rates
- Needs network to deploy
|
Ultra-Wideband (UWB) |
- High-accuracy (centimeter-level accuracy)
- More resistant to multipath interface
- Extremely power efficient
|
- Precise timing between sensors requires cabling to be synchronized
- More expensive
- Low emission limits
|